Trial Court Cannot Average Valuations

When parties disagree on value, courts must choose one-side or another based on competent evidence, unless there is a reason to average. In Giles v. Giles, 298 So. 3d 1277 (Fla. 2d DCA 2020), the trial court “split the difference” between home valuations, and the appellate court reversed.

To improve credibility in disputed valuations:

• Provide professional appraisals or expert reports.
• Demonstrate methodology (e.g., comparable sales, market trends).
• Challenge unsupported or speculative figures.

Courts must explain their reasoning, not guess. Averaging may appear fair on the surface, but it is improper unless both parties have presented credible, equivalent evidence, and the trial court articulates why it is adopting a midpoint valuation or some other number between the parties’ values.

Practically speaking, litigants should avoid relying on ballpark figures. Providing exact numbers supported by documentation strengthens your position. If the judge cannot determine which side is more credible, the party with better records and professional valuations is more likely to prevail.

If you need assistance with valuation strategy in your divorce case, contact Rhoden Law Group at 321-549-3162. We help clients present persuasive and well-supported asset valuations throughout Brevard County. Or use the contact form on this site. We serve clients throughout Brevard County, including Melbourne, Viera, Palm Bay, and the beaches.

For more information about Equitable Distribution visit our YouTube channel to get the video content you need.  Otherwise, you can always call the office to speak to one of our experienced attorneys.